Volume 1, Issue 4, December 2018, Page: 137-149
Further Thoughts on the Self-image of the Hungarian Attorneys
István H. Szilágyi, Faculty of Law and Doctoral School, Pázmány Péter Catholic University, Budapest, Hungary
Andrea Jankó-Badó, Faculty of Law and Doctoral School, Pázmány Péter Catholic University, Budapest, Hungary
Received: Oct. 1, 2018;       Accepted: Nov. 8, 2018;       Published: Dec. 26, 2018
DOI: 10.11648/j.ijls.20180104.11      View  186      Downloads  51
Abstract
By analysing focus group and directed deep interviews, this paper highlights the professional self-image of Hungarian attorneys. A summary of legal historical, sociological and legal sociological findings on the current social position of this profession is found in the introduction. It further describes how the profession gained and lost its autonomy in the second part of the 19th and early 20th century, and regained it following the 1989 democratic transition. Relying mainly on a longitudinal comprehensive study of a research group led by Ágnes Utasi, the paper summarizes the changes in the profession in recent decades: tendencies in the social stratification within and in the recruiting background of the profession, and its overall decreasing social and political capital. This is followed by a theoretical discussion of the notion of “self-image” exposing its nature and content. The self-image of the profession is understood here as a tapestry of values, norms, descriptive cultural patterns, narratives and symbols, while sociological patterns can be discerned from the conduct of the members of the profession. Having presented the applied research method, the circumstances of the two focus group interviews and the directed deep interviews taken from the research group material recorded in the same year, the authors assess the attorneys’ ideas concerning their relationship to judges, clients, forensic experts and mediators. In the reflections, contradictions and divisions can be detected in three out of the four discussed topics. As for judges, while competition and criticism concerning professional competence on the attorneys’ side seemingly run parallel to the need for communication and cooperation, they are also on a collision course with it. Similar ambivalence can be experienced in the client/attorney relation. The reasons underlying this ambivalence were observed in the deficient and inconsistent market conditions of legal services and the lack of clarity in the professional self-image. With the transforming market constraints of legal services the latter may play a role in attorneys’ divided ideas of, and critical attitude towards, each other’s work and the internal relations of the profession. The only aspect where perceptions and opinions achieved a high degree of harmony was the relation to forensic experts and mediators, showing an unequivocally critical and dismissive attitude. The paper concludes by reflecting on the social factors underlying the perceived contradictions in the professional self-image.
Keywords
Sociology of Legal Professions, Legal Culture, Professional Self-image, Qualitative Sociological Research Methods, Hungarian Attorneys
To cite this article
István H. Szilágyi, Andrea Jankó-Badó, Further Thoughts on the Self-image of the Hungarian Attorneys, International Journal of Law and Society. Vol. 1, No. 4, 2018, pp. 137-149. doi: 10.11648/j.ijls.20180104.11
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Reference
[1]
Konrad H. Jaraush : The Unfree Professions. German Lawyers, Teachers and Engineers, 1900–1950. Oxford University Press, 1990.
[2]
Michael Burrage – Rolf Torstendahl (eds.): Professions in Theory and History: Rethinking the Study of the Professions. London, Sage, 1990.
[3]
John Morison – Philip Leith – Milton Keynes: The Barrister’s World and the Nature of Law. Philadelphia, Open University Press, 1991.
[4]
Robert A. Katzmann: The Law Firm and the Public Good. Washington, The Brookings Institution, 1995.
[5]
Richard L. Abel (ed.): Lawyers. A Critical Reader. New York, The New Press, 1997.
[6]
W. Wesley Pue – David Sugarman (eds.): Lawyers and Vampires. Cultural Histories of Legal Professions. Oxford–Portland, Hart Publishing, 2003.
[7]
István Stipta: The History of Legal Profession and Legal Education [Jogászi hivatás és jogászképzés története]. In Szabó Miklós (ed.): Introduction in Legal and Political Sciences [Jog- és államtudományi alaptan]. Miskolc, Bíbor Kiadó, 1992. 168–181.
[8]
Béla P. Szabó: Legal Profession and Legal Education [Jogászság és jogászképzés]. In Szabó Miklós (ed.): Introduction in Legal and Political Scinces [Jog- és államtudományi alaptan]. Miskolc, Bíbor Kiadó, 2012. 35–62.
[9]
Szonja Navratil: The History of Legal Professions in Hungary (1868/1869–1937) [A jogászi hivatásrendek története Magyarországon (1868/1869–1937)]. Budapest, ELTE Eötvös Kiadó, 2014.
[10]
Béla Pokol: Legal Sociological Inquiries [Jogszociológiai vizsgálódások]. Budapest, Rejtjel Kiadó, 2003.
[11]
Zsolt Nagy: Segments of Legal Profession [Metszetek a jogásztársadalomról]. Szeged, Pólay Elemér Alapítvány, 2012.
[12]
Attila Badó – János Bóka: In the Gate of Europe: Reform, Justice, Service. [Európa kapujában: reform, igazság, szolgáltatás]. Miskolc, Bíbor Kiadó, 2002.
[13]
Mátyás Bencze – Attila Badó: Reforming the Hungarian Lay Justice System. In Cserne P. et al. (eds.): Theatrum Legale Mundi: Symbola Cs. Varga Oblata. Budapest, Szent István Társulat, 2007. 1–13.
[14]
Mátyás Bencze – Attila Badó: Regional Differences in the Rigour of Penal Sentencing Practice in Hungary between 2003 and 2005. [Területi eltérések a büntetéskiszabási gyakorlat szigorúságát illetően Magyarországon 2003 és 2005 között]. In Fleck Z. (ed.): Justice System in the Mirror of Science. [Igazságszolgáltatás a tudomány tükrében]. Budapest, ELTE Eötvös Kiadó, 2010.
[15]
Helga Török – Attila Badó: The Attorneys’ Image among the Business Leaders in Csongrád County, Hungary [Ügyvédkép a Csongrád megyei gazdasági vezetők körében]. Bírák Lapja 7 (1997) 104–111.
[16]
György Gajduschek: Empirical Studies of Legal Consciousness in Hungary after 1990 [Empirikus jogtudat-kutatások Magyarországon 1990 után]. Iustum Aequum Salutare 2017/1. 55–80.
[17]
István H. Szilágyi: The Theoretical Questions of the Studies in Legal Consciousness [A jogtudat-kutatások elméleti kérdései]. Iustum Aequum Salutare 2017/1. 15–36.
[18]
Antal Visegrády – Mária Schadt: Legal Consciousness and Knowledge of Law of University Students [Egyetemi hallgatók jogtudata, jogismerete]. Jogelméleti Szemle 2000/1.
[19]
László Kelemen: Law Students about Law. A Social Psychological Inquiry. [Joghallgatók a jogról. Szociálpszichológiai kutatás]. Budapest, Sprinter Kiadói Csoport, 2009.
[20]
László Kelemen – Miklós Hollán: Law Students about Law. II. A Social Psychological Inquiry. [Joghallgatók a jogról. II. Szociálpszichológiai kutatás]. Budapest–Pécs, Dialóg Campus Kiadó, 2013.
[21]
Zoltán Fleck – Frenenc Krémer – Erik Uszkiewicz – Szonja Navratil: The Rule of Law: ¬ A Technique or a Value? [Technika vagy érték a jogállam?]. Budapest: L'Harmattan Kiadó, 2012.
[22]
György Csepeli – Antal Örkény: Legal Consciousness and Prejudice in Hungary [Jogtudat és előítélet Magyarországon]. Világosság 1990/8–9. 678–683.
[23]
Mihály Fónai: Law Students. Where Are They Come from and Where Are They Going to? [Joghallgatók. Honnan jönnek és hová tartanak?] Debrecen, DE ÁJK – DELA Könyvkiadó Kft. 2014.
[24]
Ágnes Utasi (ed.): The Attorneys’ Professional Order [Az ügyvédek hivatásrendje]. Budapest, Új Mandátum, 1999.
[25]
Ágnes Utasi (ed.): Attorneys in Accelerating Time (1998–2015) [Ügyvédek a gyorsuló időben (1998–2015)]. Szeged, Belvedere Meridionale, 2016.
[26]
Zoltán Csizmadia: The Attorneys’ Relational Capital [Az ügyvédek kapcsolati tőkéje]. In Ágnes Utasi: Attorneys in Accelerating Time (1998–2015) [Ügyvédek a gyorsuló időben (1998–2015)]. Szeged, Belvedere Meridionale, 2016. 123–152.
[27]
Ágnes Utasi: Change and Continuity in the Attorneys’ Life (1998–2015) [Változás és állandóság az ügyvédek életében (1998–2015). In Ágnes Utasi: Attorneys in Accelerating Time (1998–2015) [Ügyvédek a gyorsuló időben (1998–2015)]. Szeged, Belvedere Meridionale, 2016. 11–122.
[28]
Balázs Császár: Communal Participation, Public Participation and Political Orientation [Közösségi részvétel, közéleti részvétel, politikai orientáció]. In Ágnes Utasi: Attorneys in Accelerating Time (1998–2015) [Ügyvédek a gyorsuló időben (1998–2015)]. Szeged, Belvedere Meridionale, 2016. 153–186.
[29]
Császár Balázs: The Attorneys’ Profession and the Changing Conditions of Distribtution of Legal Works. [Az ügyvédi hivatás és a jogi munkamegosztás átalakuló feltételei]. In Ágnes Utasi: Attorneys in Accelerating Time (1998–2015) [Ügyvédek a gyorsuló időben (1998–2015)]. Szeged, Belvedere Meridionale, 2016. 187–226.
[30]
John Pratt: Penal Populism. London & New York, Routledge, 2007.
[31]
Éva Ale – Orsolya Béki: Challenges of the Attorneys’ Profession [Az ügyvédi hivatás kihívásai]. In Ágnes Utasi: Attorneys in Accelerating Time (1998–2015) [Ügyvédek a gyorsuló időben (1998–2015)]. Szeged, Belvedere Meridionale, 2016. 227–290.
[32]
István H. Szilágyi: Roma Identities. Roma Identities in the XXIth Century Hungary. [Roma identitások. In Romák a XXI. század Magyarországán]. Multidiszciplináris konferencia a Kölcsey Ferenc Protestáns Szakkollégium szervezésében. Budapest: Ars Longa Alapítvány, 2001, 24–31.
[33]
Balázs Fekete: The Origin of the Contemporary Concept of Legal Culture. Lawrence M. Friedman about Legal Culture [A kortárs jogi kultúra fogalmának eredete. Lawrence M. Friedman a jogi kultúráról]. Iustum Aequum Salutare, XIII. 2017.1. 37–53.
[34]
István H. Szilágyi: Man, Society, Culture – Basic Concepts [Ember, társadalom, kultúra – alapfogalmak]. In: H. Szilágyi István (szerk.): Socio-legal Studies [Társadalmi-jogi kutatások]. Budapest, Szent István Társulat, 2012. 26–43.
[35]
Robert M. Cover: The Supreme Court, 1982 Term – Foreword: Nomos and Narrative. 97 Harvard Law Review 4 (1983).
[36]
István H. Szilágyi: There Is No Mercy. Acta Juridica Hungarica, 56 (2015) 1. 86–107.
[37]
Claudia Puchta – Jonathan Potter: Focus Group Practice. London, Sage Publications, 2004.
Browse journals by subject