This article is conducted according to a documentary theoretical investigation under a proposal that claims to have foundations of realistic orthodox scientific rigor because it is not a science fiction novel rather it is a realistic framework of what happens in the neo-contemporary progress to axioms Futurists that can be seen as retro-futuristic phenomena in terms of the applicability of the sciences of "complexity" as they call it today for the progress of neuro-legal sciences at an international and national level in any entity. This in order to see the scope before a critical point in the face of its infinitesimal axioms that collaborative fields of high scientific specialty can provide, of which are the experimental cognitive theoretical neurophysics in auxiliary support to the evolutionary and biophysically inspired computational cognitive neurosciences. Its primary scope is to recapitulate the greatest advances from a current perspective of the developments that the scientific community wants to achieve to support said theoretical application fields from which this documentary contribution can be based and a theoretical proposal of how these advances can reach their point evolution critic to his ultimate axiom of development.
| Published in | International Journal of Law and Society (Volume 5, Issue 3) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ijls.20220503.18 |
| Page(s) | 319-323 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Neurojuridics, Neurotechnology, Neurosciences, Neurolaw, Future, Evolution
| [1] | British Neuroscience Association. Neurosciences. The Science of the Brain: An Introduction for Young Learners. [on líne] 2003. https://es.slideshare.net/alehlizarraga/neuggrociencias-15560160. |
| [2] | Taruffo, M. Proceso y neurociencia. Madrid: Marcial Pons, 2013. |
| [3] | Law and cognitive neuroscience. Goodenough, O. R. y Rucker, M. 2010, Annu Rev Law Soc Sci, Vol. 6. |
| [4] | Neuroprediction of future rearrest. Aharoni, E., y otros. 15, Proc Natl Acad Sci, Vol. 110, págs. 6223-6228. |
| [5] | Dick, P. K. The monority report and otherclassic stories. s.l.: Citadel PRess. |
| [6] | Brainto-text: decoding spoken phrases from phone representations in the brain. Herff, C., y otros. Front Neurosci, Vol. 9, pág. 217. |
| [7] | Biondi, F. y Skrypchuk, L. Use your brain (and light) for innovative human-machine interfaces. s.l.: Nunes, 2017. |
| [8] | Nickel, J. W. Making sense of uman rights: Philosophcal reflections on the universal declarationof human rights. University of California Press. 1987. |
| [9] | The concept of human dignity and the realistic utopia of human rights. Habermas, J. 4, 2010, Metaphilosophy, Vol. 41, pág. 464480. |
| [10] | Fagan, A. Human rights. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. [En línea] 2005. http://www.iep.utm.edu/hum-rts [Consulta: 29 de marzo 2017]. |
| [11] | Nickel, J. Human Rights. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. [En línea] 2014. [Citado el: 21 de diciembre de 2020.] https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ rights-human/. |
| [12] | Mind matters. Boire, R. G. 1, 2003, Journal of Cognitive Liberties, Vol. 4, pág. 710. |
| [13] | Subject identification from electroencephalogram (EEG) signals during imagined speech. Brigham, K. y Kumar, B. 2010. |
| [14] | Accuracy of poligraph techniques: Problems using confessions to determine ground truth. Iacono, W. G. 1-2, 2008, Physiol Behav, Vol. 95, págs. 24-26. |
APA Style
Alfred Adan Rios. (2022). Neuro-Legal Sciences from a Neocontemporary and Futuristic Perspective. International Journal of Law and Society, 5(3), 319-323. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijls.20220503.18
ACS Style
Alfred Adan Rios. Neuro-Legal Sciences from a Neocontemporary and Futuristic Perspective. Int. J. Law Soc. 2022, 5(3), 319-323. doi: 10.11648/j.ijls.20220503.18
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ijls.20220503.18,
author = {Alfred Adan Rios},
title = {Neuro-Legal Sciences from a Neocontemporary and Futuristic Perspective},
journal = {International Journal of Law and Society},
volume = {5},
number = {3},
pages = {319-323},
doi = {10.11648/j.ijls.20220503.18},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijls.20220503.18},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijls.20220503.18},
abstract = {This article is conducted according to a documentary theoretical investigation under a proposal that claims to have foundations of realistic orthodox scientific rigor because it is not a science fiction novel rather it is a realistic framework of what happens in the neo-contemporary progress to axioms Futurists that can be seen as retro-futuristic phenomena in terms of the applicability of the sciences of "complexity" as they call it today for the progress of neuro-legal sciences at an international and national level in any entity. This in order to see the scope before a critical point in the face of its infinitesimal axioms that collaborative fields of high scientific specialty can provide, of which are the experimental cognitive theoretical neurophysics in auxiliary support to the evolutionary and biophysically inspired computational cognitive neurosciences. Its primary scope is to recapitulate the greatest advances from a current perspective of the developments that the scientific community wants to achieve to support said theoretical application fields from which this documentary contribution can be based and a theoretical proposal of how these advances can reach their point evolution critic to his ultimate axiom of development.},
year = {2022}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Neuro-Legal Sciences from a Neocontemporary and Futuristic Perspective AU - Alfred Adan Rios Y1 - 2022/08/24 PY - 2022 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijls.20220503.18 DO - 10.11648/j.ijls.20220503.18 T2 - International Journal of Law and Society JF - International Journal of Law and Society JO - International Journal of Law and Society SP - 319 EP - 323 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2640-1908 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijls.20220503.18 AB - This article is conducted according to a documentary theoretical investigation under a proposal that claims to have foundations of realistic orthodox scientific rigor because it is not a science fiction novel rather it is a realistic framework of what happens in the neo-contemporary progress to axioms Futurists that can be seen as retro-futuristic phenomena in terms of the applicability of the sciences of "complexity" as they call it today for the progress of neuro-legal sciences at an international and national level in any entity. This in order to see the scope before a critical point in the face of its infinitesimal axioms that collaborative fields of high scientific specialty can provide, of which are the experimental cognitive theoretical neurophysics in auxiliary support to the evolutionary and biophysically inspired computational cognitive neurosciences. Its primary scope is to recapitulate the greatest advances from a current perspective of the developments that the scientific community wants to achieve to support said theoretical application fields from which this documentary contribution can be based and a theoretical proposal of how these advances can reach their point evolution critic to his ultimate axiom of development. VL - 5 IS - 3 ER -
Email: